Followers

Sunday, July 20, 2025

IS ISLAM THE BEST FRIEND JUDAISM EVER HAD?



By the end of this article, I hope to demonstrate that, historically, Islam has provided some of the most enduring periods of peace, dignity, and prosperity for Jewish communities.

Let us begin with a compelling moment from history — one that exemplifies Islamic values of justice, humility, and respect for religious diversity.

________________________________________

The Conquest Without Bloodshed

In the year 637 CE, Caliph ʿUmar ibn al-Khattab entered the holy city of Jerusalem. But this was no ordinary conquest. There was no massacre, no looting, no forced conversions. 

The Christian Patriarch Sophronius, who had agreed to surrender the city, insisted on handing over the keys personally to the Muslim caliph, trusting in his fairness.

When ʿUmar arrived, he came not as a conqueror, but as a humble servant of God — walking alongside his attendant, even switching places with him during the journey so as not to privilege himself.

When prayer time came during a tour of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, ʿUmar chose not to pray inside the church — not because he was unwelcome, but because he feared that future generations of Muslims might convert the church into a mosque on the grounds that the Caliph once prayed there. He prayed instead on the steps outside, leaving the church protected for Christian worshippers.

This act of restraint and reverence became a hallmark of how Islam, at its best, treated the People of the Book — Jews and Christians alike — with respect, justice, and a sense of shared belonging in the broader ummah of human civilization.

________________________________________

The Return of a Forgotten People

As ʿUmar walked through the sacred city, another troubling truth struck him: the Jews were missing.

They had been banished from Jerusalem for centuries — first by the Romans following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, and later by the Christian Byzantine rulers who continued to enforce the ban. A people who once built their spiritual and cultural life in this city were now absent from its streets, synagogues, and sacred grounds.

ʿUmar was shocked. 

This went against the very grain of the Islamic vision — a vision that honored the followers of previous prophets and upheld their right to live, worship, and thrive.

So he acted.

ʿUmar climbed the Temple Mount, known to Muslims as Al-Haram al-Sharif, and found it buried under centuries of garbage and ruin. The sacred space had been defiled, abandoned, and desecrated — a bitter symbol of centuries of humiliation.

Rather than issuing orders from afar, ʿUmar rolled up his sleeves and began cleaning the site himself. With his own hands, he helped clear the filth, initiating the restoration of a place deeply tied to the Abrahamic tradition. It was an act of both humility and solidarity.

But ʿUmar didn’t stop there. He took the bold and unprecedented step of inviting the Jews back to Jerusalem.

Under his leadership, they were allowed to return and rebuild their lives in the very city from which they had been expelled for over 500 years. He appointed Kaʿb al-Ahbar, a respected Jewish scholar who had embraced Islam, to help identify the exact site of the ancient Temple so that it could be properly honored. 

Jewish families returned, synagogues reopened, and the Jewish presence in Jerusalem was reborn — not in opposition to Islam, but under its protection.

This was not mere tolerance. It was a moral correction, a redemptive gesture aligned with the Qur’anic call to justice and dignity for all communities of faith.

The Qur’anic Compass: Justice, Pluralism, and Sacred Space

ʿUmar ibn al-Khattab’s actions in Jerusalem were not simply political maneuvers or diplomatic gestures. They reflected the moral and spiritual framework laid down by the Qur’an — a scripture that calls believers to justice, compassion, and the protection of all who worship God.

At the heart of Islamic governance is the principle of ʿadl (justice). The Qur’an commands:

“Indeed, Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due and when you judge between people to judge with justice…”

(Qur’an 4:58)

ʿUmar lived by this principle. His insistence on fairness, his refusal to pray in the church, and his invitation for Jews to return to Jerusalem all reflect the Qur’anic ethos that justice must be universal and impartial, regardless of one’s faith or tribe.

Even more powerful is the Qur'an’s affirmation of religious pluralism and the protection of sacred places of worship. In Surah Al-Hajj, God speaks of the necessity of defending not only mosques but also synagogues, churches, and monasteries — because in all of them, His name is remembered:

"...Had Allah not repelled some people by means of others, monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques — where Allah’s Name is often mentioned — would have been destroyed. Surely Allah supports those who support Him..."

(Qur’an 22:40, Sahih International)

This verse is profoundly inclusive. It recognizes the holiness of all places where God is worshipped, not just Islamic ones. It commands Muslims to stand up not only for their own religious rights but also for the freedom and sanctity of others.

ʿUmar’s decision to protect Christian churches and restore Jewish presence in Jerusalem was therefore not a political anomaly — it was an embodiment of Qur’anic values. He understood that justice is not about favoring one's own group, but about upholding truth, dignity, and the shared human pursuit of the Divine.

Islam, at its roots, is a faith that honors diversity as part of God’s design. As the Qur’an declares:

“To each among you We have prescribed a law and a clear way. If Allah had willed, He could have made you one community. But He willed to test you in what He has given you; so compete with one another in doing good.”

(Qur’an 5:48)

These verses reflect the spiritual source from which ʿUmar drew his leadership — a Qur’anic worldview that sees religious difference not as a threat, but as a divine invitation to mutual respect, cooperation, and moral excellence.

The Covenant of Madinah: The Qur’an in Action

If ʿUmar’s actions in Jerusalem reflected Qur’anic principles in practice, then the Covenant of Madinah was their foundational blueprint — the first real-world constitution built upon the moral and legal vision of the Qur’an.

Drafted by Prophet Muhammad ﷺ shortly after his migration to Madinah, the Covenant (or Constitution) of Madinah was a groundbreaking document. It brought together Muslims, Jews, and pagan Arab tribes under a single political entity — not through conquest, but through a mutual agreement that honored each community’s identity, rights, and responsibilities.

What made the Covenant remarkable was that it did not impose religious uniformity. Instead, it affirmed religious freedom and pluralism as a basis for political unity.

One clause stated:

“The Jews of Banu Awf are one community with the believers. To the Jews their religion, and to the Muslims their religion.”

Each Jewish tribe mentioned in the covenant was given similar recognition. This wasn’t just tolerance — it was constitutional inclusion.

The Covenant outlined shared responsibilities: mutual defense, the pursuit of justice, and peaceful coexistence. It also introduced economic cooperation, recognizing private property, trade rights, and dispute resolution mechanisms that reflected both Qur’anic ethics and local tribal customs.

A Constitution Rooted in Revelation

The Covenant of Madinah was not a secular contract. It was rooted in the Qur’an — a living expression of verses like:

• “Do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just: that is nearer to righteousness...”

(Qur’an 5:8)

• “There is no compulsion in religion...”

(Qur’an 2:256)

• “Help one another in righteousness and piety, and do not help one another in sin and aggression...”

(Qur’an 5:2)

The Prophet ﷺ translated these values into a civic structure — proving that Islam is not merely a private faith, but a complete way of life that includes social, political, and economic justice.

The Link to Our Topic

The Covenant of Madinah offers direct insight into how Islam historically treated Jewish communities. At Islam’s very foundation, Jews were recognized not as outsiders, but as partners in a shared society. They were guaranteed safety, freedom of religion, and autonomy — so long as they honored the mutual covenant of peace and responsibility.

The respect shown to Jews in Jerusalem by ʿUmar, a student of the Prophet ﷺ, was not an exception but a continuation of this constitutional ethic. Both the Covenant of Madinah and ʿUmar’s leadership reflect a deeply Qur’anic worldview: one that sees Jews and Christians not as threats, but as fellow People of the Book — part of a divine family of faith.

The Golden Age in Al-Andalus: When Jews Called Muslims Their Protectors

Following the initial wave of Islamic expansion into the Iberian Peninsula in the 8th century, Muslim Spain — Al-Andalus — became a center of science, philosophy, and interfaith cooperation. For nearly 700 years, it stood as a beacon of tolerance and intellectual flourishing, particularly for the Jewish community.

It was here that Jewish culture experienced a renaissance. Hebrew poetry thrived. Rabbinic scholarship deepened. Jews held high government positions, founded schools, and contributed to medicine, astronomy, and philosophy — all under Muslim rule.

One remarkable figure was Hasdai ibn Shaprut, a Jewish physician and diplomat who served as foreign minister and court physician to Caliph ʿAbd al-Rahman III in Córdoba. Under Muslim patronage, he negotiated treaties with Christian kings and even corresponded with Jewish communities in Central Asia.

Later, the towering philosopher Maimonides (Rabbi Moses ben Maimon), born in Córdoba, studied Muslim thinkers like Ibn Rushd (Averroes), wrote in Arabic, and was deeply shaped by the Islamic intellectual climate. He later served as court physician to Saladin’s royal family in Egypt — the very sultan who reclaimed Jerusalem from the Crusaders.

But this golden age wasn’t just for elite scholars and officials.

Ordinary Jews in Al-Andalus were allowed to freely practice their religion, build synagogues, and manage their own communal affairs. They could own property, run businesses, engage in trade, and participate in the bustling marketplaces of Granada, Seville, and Córdoba. Jewish communities had educational institutions, religious courts, and social welfare systems, operating with considerable autonomy.

They lived side by side with Muslims and Christians — sometimes even in mixed neighborhoods — sharing languages, architecture, and cuisine. Though Jews paid the jizyah (a tax on non-Muslims), it came with the guarantee of protection, legal rights, and religious freedom — far from the violent persecution they often faced in the north.

________________________________________

The Ottoman Empire: A Refuge in the Storm

In 1492, the Catholic monarchs of Spain issued the Alhambra Decree, expelling all Jews from Spain under threat of death. Their homes, synagogues, and properties were confiscated. Tens of thousands were forced to flee.

Where did they go?

Many found refuge in the Ottoman Empire, where Sultan Bayezid II welcomed them with open arms. He reportedly mocked the Spanish king for “impoverishing his kingdom and enriching mine.”

The Jewish refugees brought with them skills in printing, medicine, trade, and diplomacy — and they quickly became valued members of Ottoman society.

Cities like Salonika (modern Thessaloniki) became major centers of Jewish life under Ottoman protection. There, Jewish printing presses flourished, yeshivot (religious schools) were established, and Jews lived with a degree of autonomy under their own religious courts (bet din).

And what about ordinary Jews?

They were permitted to rebuild vibrant communities throughout the empire — in Istanbul, Sarajevo, Izmir, Damascus, and beyond. Jews lived openly and practiced their religion freely. Synagogues were built without fear, Sabbath was observed without restriction, and kosher dietary laws were practiced publicly.

Economically, Jews engaged in textile production, metalwork, banking, and international trade. Some worked as artisans, others as merchants or translators. Jewish communities had their own internal leadership, regulated communal taxes, and provided education for their children. The Ottomans even allowed Jewish communities to publish books and newspapers in Ladino (Judeo-Spanish) and Hebrew.

While not equal in status to Muslims under Islamic law, Jews in the Ottoman realm lived with a remarkable level of peace, stability, and cultural autonomy — especially compared to the ghettos and forced conversions of Europe.

Jews in the Modern Middle East: Echoes of Coexistence

Before the colonial fragmentation and the wars of the mid-20th century, the Middle East was home to vibrant Jewish communities that had existed for centuries — in Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Morocco, and Tunisia. These communities spoke Arabic, Persian, Kurdish, and Berber; they ate the same food, wore the same clothes, and celebrated festivals alongside their Muslim neighbors.

Iran: Jews as Protected Citizens

Iran is still home to the largest Jewish population in the Middle East outside of Israel, numbering between 8,000 to 15,000 today. Before the 1979 revolution, the community was even larger and more visible. Despite political tensions between Iran and Israel, Iranian Jews are allowed to worship freely, run their own schools, and elect a representative to parliament.

Jewish shops in Tehran and Shiraz are part of the urban landscape. Synagogues are open. Hebrew is taught. While there are limitations, particularly due to the strained international context, Iranian Jews have not been forced to hide their identity. They are not Zionists — they are Iranian Jews, and they are recognized as such.

Notably, Dr. Siamak Moreh Sedgh, an Iranian Jew, serves as a member of the Iranian Parliament, representing the Jewish community. Before him, Maurice Motamed, another Jewish Iranian MP, held the same post and publicly defended the rights of Jews within the Islamic Republic. They’ve participated in national debate, visited Holocaust memorials abroad, and criticized Israel’s policies — all while being treated as legitimate voices within Iran’s political system.

Morocco: A Jewish-Muslim Cultural Memory

In Morocco, Jews lived peacefully for centuries under Muslim rule. At their peak, they made up over 10% of the population. Moroccan Jews were artisans, musicians, traders, scholars — fully integrated into society. They had their own quarters (mellahs) not as ghettos, but as protected districts within the city, often adjacent to royal palaces for added security.

Even after large emigration waves post-1948, King Mohammed V refused to hand Moroccan Jews over to the Nazis during World War II, famously declaring:

“There are no Jews in Morocco. There are only subjects.”

Today, Morocco has preserved its Jewish cemeteries, restored synagogues, and teaches Jewish history in schools — a rare gesture of reconciliation and remembrance.

Morocco has also appointed Jews to senior advisory roles. One prominent figure is André Azoulay, a Jewish Moroccan who served as senior adviser to two Moroccan kings: King Hassan II and King Mohammed VI. Azoulay has long been a symbol of Moroccan pluralism, promoting interfaith dialogue, supporting Palestinian rights, and preserving Jewish heritage.

Iraq: A Broken Legacy, But Once a Jewel

Before the American invasion and decades of instability, Baghdad was once a center of Jewish life in the Arab world. Jews in Iraq were so central to the country’s economy, education, and government that by the early 20th century, a third of Baghdad’s population was Jewish.

They ran hospitals, schools, and newspapers. Jewish writers, poets, and judges shaped Iraq’s cultural identity. The community lived in harmony with its Muslim neighbors for centuries.

Notably, Sassoon Eskell, an Iraqi Jew, served as the first Finance Minister of modern Iraq in the early 20th century and was a founding figure of the Iraqi state. He was known as “The Father of Parliament” and drafted much of the country’s legal and fiscal framework under King Faisal I. Faisal is famously quoted as saying:

“Sassoon Eskell is worth his weight in gold for Iraq.”

Sadly, political shifts, war, and external pressure led to the community’s exodus — but the memory of that coexistence still lives in the oral histories of both Jews and Muslims from Iraq.

________________________________________

This inclusion demonstrates that even in the modern era, Jews held positions of authority, influence, and respect within Muslim-majority states — not in spite of Islam, but within its broader civilizational ethic of coexistence.

What About the Future?

Learning from the Past

What have we seen so far?

We have revisited a long chapter of human history that tells a different story from today’s headlines — one in which Jews and Muslims lived together in peace, dignity, and cooperation. From the Prophet Muhammad’s ﷺ Covenant of Madinah, to ʿUmar ibn al-Khattab’s restoration of Jewish presence in Jerusalem, to the flourishing of Jewish life in Al-Andalus and the Ottoman Empire, the pattern is unmistakable:

When Muslims live by the Qur’an, Jews live in security.

Whether in the courts of Cordoba or the parliaments of Iran and Morocco, Jews not only practiced their religion freely but participated in governance, law, trade, science, and cultural life — often with honor and influence.

Yes, there were exceptions — moments when Muslim rulers betrayed their own teachings and harmed the communities under their care. But these were deviations, not the default. The overall arc of history is clear.

________________________________________

If History Is a Guide…

Then Jewish welfare has consistently been strongest when Muslims are united, confident, and guided by the Qur’an.

It was not when Muslims were vengeful or militaristic, but when they were just, principled, and self-possessed — acting on the Qur’an, the Prophet’s ﷺ example, and the path of the rightly guided Caliphs — that Jewish communities prospered.

And so we ask: what about the future?

As we look ahead, I hold this conviction firmly:

Even after decades of Zionist cruelty and occupation, Muslims will return to the Qur’an.

We are not allowed to act out of vengeance. To do so would be to make the wrongful Zionists our teachers, and Benjamin Netanyahu our role model.

But our role models are not found in Tel Aviv or in retaliatory hatred.

Our teachers are the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali. Our compass is the Qur’an.

We must not let injustice make us unjust. And we must not answer cruelty with cruelty — for that would only deepen the wounds of history and betray the very ethics we claim to uphold.

________________________________________

A Call to Righteous Partnership

To our Jewish brothers and sisters who oppose the Zionist regime and its inhumanity:

Re-connect. Re-build. Re-join hands with Muslims and with all communities of conscience — those who are just, trustworthy, and morally grounded.

The current madness of Zionism is not just short-sighted, it is self-destructive. History shows that when empires and ideologies rise on injustice, they do not last. But their collapse often drags down the innocent with the guilty.

The more Zionists act with brutality, the more they risk repeating a pattern where the world turns not just against injustice, but against the entire Jewish people — a tragedy that has played out too many times in history.

True allies of the Jewish people today must reject Zionist extremism, and work for a future rooted in justice, coexistence, and humility.

________________________________________

The Qur’an Has the Final Word

"O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah, witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just: that is nearer to righteousness."

(Qur’an 5:8)

"Indeed, this Qur’an guides to that which is most upright and gives good news to the believers who do righteous deeds that they will have a great reward."

(Qur’an 17:9)

"And cooperate in righteousness and piety, but do not cooperate in sin and aggression. And fear Allah; indeed, Allah is severe in penalty."

(Qur’an 5:2)

"Good and evil are not equal. Repel evil with what is better; then the one you were in conflict with may become as close as a devoted friend."

(Qur’an 41:34)

________________________________________

Islam has been — and still can be — the best friend Judaism ever had.

The question is whether the Jewish people will have the wisdom to build better relationships with Muslims — and whether we, the Muslims, will have the courage and discipline to return to what our faith actually teaches us: to unite, be strong, and be successful, and to use the power we have not for dominance or revenge, but to manage justice in the world.

Peace, 

Anas Zubedy

Penang


Saturday, July 19, 2025

THE QUR’AN AND DREAMS: WHAT ALLAH’S BOOK SAYS ABOUT VISIONS IN SLEEP


Dreams occupy a powerful place in human imagination. Cultures throughout history have treated them as messages from the divine, glimpses into the soul, or the product of the subconscious mind.
But what does the Qur’an — God’s final revelation to humanity — actually say about dreams? When we confine ourselves strictly to a Qur’an bil Qur’an approach — that is, letting the Qur’an explain itself without relying on external sources like hadith, tafsir, or psychological theory — a consistent and striking picture emerges.
The Qur’an mentions dreams primarily in the context of Prophets and key events. However, it uses different Arabic words to refer to these experiences, and their precise meanings shape how we understand the significance of each dream.
This article will explore those terms, examine the Prophet stories involving dreams, and conclude with a critical insight about Prophet Muhammad ﷺ and the nature of authority in Islam — where even he was forbidden from acting on any dream unless it was confirmed through revelation.
________________________________________
The Three Qur’anic Words for Dreams
The Qur’an uses three key Arabic terms to describe dreams or what is seen during sleep: ru’yā (رُؤْيَا), manām (مَنَام), and aḥlām (أَحْلَام).
1. Ru’yā (رُؤْيَا) – A True Vision
The term ru’yā is derived from the root ر-أ-ي (ra-’a), which means "to see." In Qur’anic usage, ru’yā often refers to a true vision — a dream that is not random or confused, but clear, purposeful, and often prophetic. It implies that the dream is not merely a subconscious experience but potentially a message from God.
We see this term used in:
• Surah Yusuf (12:4): “Indeed, I saw [in a dream] eleven stars and the sun and the moon; I saw them prostrating to me.”
• Surah Yusuf (12:100): “This is the interpretation of my [former] vision (ru’yā) — my Lord has made it reality.”
• Surah Al-Fath (48:27): “Certainly has Allah showed His Messenger the vision (ru’yā) in truth...”
In each case, ru’yā is used when the vision is confirmed — either by later events or explicitly by God — as true.
2. Manām (مَنَام) – What One Sees in Sleep
The word manām comes from the root ن-و-م (na-wama), meaning "to sleep." It refers to the state of sleeping or to the dream itself in a more general or neutral sense. It is not inherently prophetic or divine unless God later confirms it as such. It is the word used in the story of Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) when he sees himself sacrificing his son.
• Surah As-Saffat (37:102): “O my son, indeed I see in the sleep (manām) that I am sacrificing you...”
Initially, this is simply something seen in sleep — its authority or meaning isn’t immediately confirmed.
3. Aḥlām (أَحْلَام) – Confused or Vain Dreams
Aḥlām is the plural of ḥulm (حُلُم), and it refers to confused, incoherent, or idle dreams. These are dreams not considered meaningful or divine. In fact, this word appears only in the mouth of disbelievers in the Qur’an when they are dismissing the dreams of prophets as nonsense.
• Surah Yusuf (12:44): “They said, ‘[These are but] confused dreams (aḥlām); and we are not learned in the interpretation of dreams.’”
So, the Qur’an clearly categorizes dreams: ru’yā is honored and true, manām is neutral or ambiguous, and aḥlām is confused and worthless.
________________________________________
Prophets and Dreams: Who Had Them?
The Qur’an directly connects three Prophets to dreams: Yusuf (Joseph), Ibrahim (Abraham), and Muhammad ﷺ. Each episode serves a distinct purpose, and each dream is either confirmed by God or reframed to reveal a deeper spiritual lesson.
1. Prophet Yusuf (Joseph): The Master Interpreter
Yusuf’s story in Surah Yusuf is the most dream-intensive narrative in the Qur’an.
• His own childhood dream (12:4): He sees eleven stars, the sun, and the moon prostrating to him — which is later fulfilled when his family comes to Egypt in humility before him (12:100).
• The dreams of two prisoners (12:36): One sees himself pressing wine, the other carrying bread on his head. Yusuf interprets both correctly.
• The king’s dream (12:43): Seven fat cows devoured by seven lean ones — a metaphor for seven years of prosperity followed by seven years of famine.
Here, Yusuf is given ilm ta’wīl al-aḥādīth (knowledge of dream interpretation, 12:6), but importantly, even he does not declare a dream true unless the outcome confirms it — or unless God affirms its meaning.
2. Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham): A Test in a Dream — Not a Command to Kill
In the Qur’an, Prophet Ibrahim sees a vision in sleep — manām — where he is sacrificing his son:
“So when he reached the age of exertion, he said, ‘O my son, indeed I see in the sleep (manām) that I am sacrificing you, so see what you think.’”
(Surah As-Saffat 37:102)
This is crucial: Ibrahim says, “I see,” not “God told me.” There is no command from Allah in the vision, no voice instructing him to kill. It is simply a scene that Ibrahim witnesses in his sleep. At no point does the Qur’an state that Allah ordered him to sacrifice his son. The Prophet interprets the vision as a call to act — and out of sincere submission, he prepares to do so.
After Ibrahim shows willingness, God intervenes:
“O Ibrahim, you have fulfilled the vision. Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good. Indeed, this was a clear trial (bala’ mubīn). And We ransomed him with a great sacrifice.”
(37:105–107)
Here, the Qur’an reframes the dream retroactively as a ru’yā — a true vision — but not because it was a literal divine command. Rather, it was a test of moral and spiritual surrender. The point of the story is not obedience to a command to kill (which never came), but Ibrahim’s devotion and God’s immediate correction through mercy and substitution.
The Qur’an affirms the sanctity of life and never allows unjust killing — not even in prophetic dreams.
This Qur’anic portrayal sharply contrasts with the Biblical version found in Genesis 22:
“Then God said, ‘Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.’”
(Genesis 22:2, NIV)
In the Bible, it is explicitly God commanding the sacrifice. In the Qur’an, God never gives such an order. The story becomes a lesson in faith, mercy, and correction — not divine cruelty or blind obedience.
The broader Qur’anic moral framework supports this reading. Allah categorically prohibits the killing of the innocent:
“Do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden, except by right.”
(Surah Al-An’am 6:151)
“Nor take life — which Allah has made sacred — except for a just cause.”
(Surah Al-Isra 17:33)
“Whoever kills a soul — unless for a soul or for corruption in the land — it is as if he had slain mankind entirely.”
(Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:32)
These verses leave no room for ambiguity: the sanctity of innocent life is absolute, and God does not test His prophets by asking them to violate His own moral laws. To suggest otherwise is to project non-Qur’anic narratives — like the Biblical one — onto the Qur’anic text.
Thus, Ibrahim’s vision was not a divine order to kill, but a test of inner submission and willingness. And just as significantly, it was a public lesson: God intervened, ransomed the child with a ram, and showed that submission to God must always align with moral law, not contradict it.
The Qur’an ends the story not with trauma or tragedy, but with redemption and mercy — emphasizing that true submission leads not to violence, but to divine compassion.
________________________________________
The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ and the True Vision
The Qur’an records only one confirmed dream of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ — the vision of entering the Sacred Mosque in peace:
• Surah Al-Fath (48:27):
“Certainly has Allah showed His Messenger the vision (ru’yā) in truth. You will surely enter al-Masjid al-Haram, if Allah wills, in safety...”
This dream is validated by Allah Himself — it is ru’yā ḥaqq (true vision). The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and the eventual peaceful entry into Mecca confirms the accuracy of the vision.
And yet, this is the exception — not the norm. Throughout the Qur’an, God strictly instructs the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ to act only upon what is revealed directly through wahi (revelation) — not dreams, feelings, or personal inspiration.
________________________________________
The Prophet Cannot Act on Dreams or Assumptions
This is where the Qur’an becomes profoundly clear:
Surah 6:106
“Follow what has been revealed to you from your Lord.”
Surah 10:15
“Say, ‘It is not for me to change it of my own accord. I only follow what is revealed to me.’”
Surah 53:3–4
“Nor does he speak from [his own] desire. It is but a revelation revealed.”
These verses establish a principle: even the Messenger of God cannot act on his own initiative — not on personal dreams, emotions, or wisdom — unless God confirms it through revelation. The Prophet is entirely bound to wahi. This has profound implications: even if he saw a dream, unless God affirmed it explicitly, he would not — and could not — treat it as authoritative.
This Qur’anic restriction guards against the dangers of subjectivity, guesswork, and delusion. And if this standard applies to the Prophet himself, how much more cautious should the rest of us be when assigning spiritual weight to our own dreams?
________________________________________
Conclusion: The Final Authority Belongs Only to Revelation
The Qur’an elevates dreams when they are true (ru’yā ḥaqq) and confirms them as such — but not otherwise.
The Prophet Yusuf interpreted dreams, but always in alignment with divine guidance. Prophet Ibrahim acted on a vision but was stopped by God, who clarified it as a test — not a license to take innocent life. The Qur’an’s moral framework never wavers: the sanctity of life is absolute unless guilt has been established by truth and justice. And even the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the seal of the messengers, was commanded never to act on dreams or assumptions unless explicitly guided by revelation.
In an age where people often claim dreams, visions, or "signs" as justification for religious or personal decisions, the Qur’an reminds us of a humbling truth: truth is not what we see in sleep, but what God reveals with certainty. And that revelation — the Qur’an — is before us, preserved, recited, and complete.
As the Qur’an proclaims:
“This [Qur’an] is not a word invented, but a confirmation of what came before it and a detailed explanation of all things — a guidance and a mercy for those who believe.”
(Qur’an 12:111)
And that includes even the matter of dreams.
Peace, anas

Thursday, July 17, 2025

WHAT WOULD MOSES, JESUS, AND MUHAMMAD SAY ABOUT PALESTINE TODAY?

 


WHAT WOULD MOSES, JESUS, AND MUHAMMAD SAY ABOUT PALESTINE TODAY?

In the face of the ongoing tragedy in Palestine, where civilians—men, women, and children—continue to suffer the consequences of war, displacement, and occupation, we are compelled to ask: WHAT WOULD MOSES, JESUS, AND MUHAMMAD SAY IF THEY WERE ALIVE TODAY?

These three spiritual leaders, revered across Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, stood for timeless principles: justice for the oppressed, mercy for the suffering, and a profound reverence for human life.

Moses, the prophet who led the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt, knew deeply the pain of persecution and exile. His message, as recorded in the Torah, still echoes today: “Do not oppress a stranger, for you know the soul of a stranger—you were strangers in Egypt” (Exodus 23:9).

The Talmud reinforces this ethic of life, stating, “Whoever saves a single life is considered to have saved the entire world” (Sanhedrin 37a). Moses would likely call out the injustice of collective punishment and displacement, reminding us that true power lies in humility before God and protection of the weak—not in domination over others.

Jesus of Nazareth, born in Bethlehem under Roman occupation, championed radical compassion, peace, and love for one’s enemies. In the Sermon on the Mount, he taught, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God” (Matthew 5:9).

He reminded his followers that what we do for “the least of these” is what we do for him (Matthew 25:40). Were Jesus present today, he would mourn with victims on all sides, comfort the grieving, and challenge political and religious leaders to act with mercy. He would stand firmly against violence, even in the name of righteousness, and urge all to choose the path of reconciliation.

The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, who brought the Qur’an to a fractured Arabian Peninsula, consistently advocated for the dignity of the oppressed while insisting on strict ethical guidelines in conflict. The Qur’an teaches, “Do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness” (Qur’an 5:8), and “Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress. God does not love transgressors” (Qur’an 2:190). Muhammad ﷺ forbade the killing of women, children, and non-combatants, and encouraged peace when possible: “If they incline to peace, then incline to it also” (Qur’an 8:61).

Today, he would likely denounce the indiscriminate killing of civilians and call all sides to justice grounded in mercy and mutual respect.

While they lived centuries apart, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad would find unity in this moment—not in allegiance to one side, but in their shared horror at the suffering of innocents.

They would cry for every child lost, every family shattered, and every soul dehumanized by hatred. They would demand moral accountability, urge restraint, and call on us to reject vengeance. Most importantly, they would remind us that peace is not possible without justice—and justice is not justice unless it applies equally to all.

The deeper question, then, is not merely what they would say—but whether we, in our political decisions, our prayers, and our principles, are willing to listen.

And to the descendants of Moses—the Children of Israel—the Qur’an offers this eternal reminder, one that speaks across time, conflict, and ideology:

“Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul—unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land—it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one—it is as if he had saved mankind entirely.”

— Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:32), Sahih International

Let all who claim to follow these prophets take heed. Let us remember the sacred worth of every life—and act accordingly.

Peace.

Anas Zubedy

Penang

 

Sunday, July 6, 2025

BEING HONEST ON BOTH SIDES: THE ANTIDOTE TO HYPOCRISY



In Malaysia, a country built upon the beauty of diversity, being honest on both sides is not just a personal virtue—it is a national necessity.
Whether in politics, religion, race relations, or social issues, honesty across the board is the foundation of unity. It means being just, fair, and balanced, regardless of whose side we’re on. It calls us to rise above tribal loyalty and partisan rhetoric, and to stand by what is right—even when it is uncomfortable.
To be honest on both sides is to be consistent. It is to judge ourselves by the same standards we use on others. We don’t pick and choose the truth based on convenience or colour. We don’t pretend to be moral while bending the truth to serve our side. We speak the truth, seek it, and stand for it—especially when it is inconvenient.
This principle is deeply rooted in every major faith tradition practiced in Malaysia.
In the Qur’an, God commands justice even when it goes against our own interests:
“O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for Allah, even if it be against yourselves or parents and relatives…”
(Surah An-Nisa 4:135)
Similarly, in the Bible, we are told:
“Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.”
(John 7:24)
And also,
“Why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to notice the beam in your own?”
(Matthew 7:3)
The Buddhist Dhammapada teaches:
“The fault of others is easily seen; one’s own fault is difficult to see.”
(Dhammapada, Verse 252)
And from the Bhagavad Gita in Hinduism:
“Perform your duty with an even mind, abandoning all attachment to success or failure. Such evenness of mind is called yoga.”
(Bhagavad Gita 2:48)
These teachings echo the same wisdom: honesty, self-reflection, and fairness are core to spiritual growth and social harmony.
So, who then are the hypocrites?
Hypocrites are those who pretend to live by high principles but bend them when it benefits their side. They are harsh in judging others, yet lenient with themselves. They twist narratives to win debates, not to 9 are threatened by accountability and angered by honest feedback. In public, they preach morality; in private, they practice double standards.
In the Qur’an, hypocrisy is condemned in strong terms:
“Do you order righteousness to the people and forget yourselves while you recite the Scripture? Then will you not reason?”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:44)
How, then, do we avoid being hypocrites and instead become people who are honest on both sides?
Start with ikhlas—sincerity. Let justice and truth be your guiding lights. Make it a habit to consider both sides of any argument before forming a conclusion. Better still, look for a third way—an inclusive solution that benefits all. Be harder on yourself before you are hard on others. Let your actions reflect your principles. If you preach unity, practice empathy. If you stand for justice, live it at home, at work, and in public life.
Practice moderation. In Islam, the Prophet ﷺ was sent as a bringer of balance:
“And thus We have made you a just community (ummatan wasatan)...”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:143)
Malaysia needs more wasatiyyah—the middle path. We need leaders and citizens alike who are brave enough to be fair to both friend and foe. We need to reward truth, not tribalism.
Let us remind ourselves: when we are honest on both sides, we are not weak—we are principled. We are not fence-sitters—we are bridge-builders. We are not neutral—we are fair.
And in doing so, we honour the spirit of all our traditions, and we help build a more united Malaysia.
Let us be honest on both sides, and never be hypocrites.
Let us be the bridge Malaysia needs.
— Anas Zubedy

Saturday, July 5, 2025

I WAS ONCE ACCUSED OF BEING ANTI-SEMITIC BY A FELLOW MALAYSIAN 😊

 


For nearly two decades since 2001, my company has placed full-page advertisements in The Star newspaper during festive seasons. These ads typically carried messages of unity, cooperation, and peace.

In 2006, for the Aidilfitri celebration, our message was part of the “Imagine” series. The advertisement read as follows:

“ Imagine… Peace in the Middle East

It breaks our hearts each time we see the innocent especially children hurt, made homeless and murdered regardless whether they are Arabs or Jews. In our hearts we all want an end to the conflict.

To make peace, we must first understand Jew insecurity and comprehend why they opted for the Zionist solution. We must empathize with their history of persecution and pogroms, identify with their need to be both Jew and free. Free to reach their highest potential and contribute to humanity just like any other community.

Ironically, Jews experienced the longest peace and freedom to practice Judaism; their way of life, during Muslim rule. The Covenant of Medina gave them the rights and dignity to join the human race and made them universal citizens and put an end to the status of an exiled outlaw.

They were free to live, contribute and be Jews in any corner of the Muslim administrative. Judaism prospered. It is no exaggeration to say that Islam is the best friend Judaism ever had.

Jews were free and secure for centuries when Muslims were united and strong. Jew security and freedom was tied to Muslim unity and success. Muslim Unity can go a long way to bring peace in the Middle East.

Here Malaysia can contribute. Islam Hadhari can be a catalyst for Muslim Unity. The Malaysian constitution resembles The Covenant of Medina where Islam is the official religion and other traditions are allowed the freedom to practice and prosper. Our history of compromise and working together is a living example and a workable model. Our framework is peace and respect for each other’s way of life. Malaysians can show the way.

The prerequisite for any community to be successful is Peace. Peace requires change from both sides. Jews must realise that Zionism cannot bring about security, they must work with Muslims and return what is not theirs to the Palestinians. Muslims must get their act together, unite and becoming strong again to set the platform for peace in the Middle East.

Imagine you and I… changing the world for the better!”

Typically, our ads receive positive feedback from fellow Malaysians. Many call or write in with words of encouragement, thanking us and urging us to continue the good work.

However, this particular ad drew a different kind of response.

A few days after the advert appeared, my personal assistant passed me a phone call from an elderly Malaysian gentleman. He began by asking if I was the one who wrote the advert. Expecting the usual kind words, I happily said yes.

His next question took me by surprise:

“Are you anti-Semitic?”

I laughed out loud and replied, “Absolutely not!”

But he insisted that I was. Calmly, I responded, “Brother, I have Arab ancestry. I’m one of the Semitic people. I cannot be anti-myself, can I?”

There was a pause. Then, he shouted, “What nonsense are you talking about?” I was about to explain who the Semitic people are, but he abruptly hung up.

That exchange made me realise how little many Malaysians—perhaps many people in general—know about the term “Semitic.” So, let me briefly explain.

Who Are the Semitic People?

To understand who the Semitic peoples are, it’s important to see them not as a single race or ethnic group, but as a family of languages and cultures that have evolved over thousands of years. What unites them is not only shared ancestry but also the languages they speak and the deep historical contributions they’ve made to human civilization—especially in religion, philosophy, and science.

The term “Semitic” comes from Shem, one of Prophet Noah’s sons, as mentioned in the Bible. In the 18th century, European scholars began using this name to classify a group of languages, including Hebrew, Arabic, Aramaic, and Akkadian. Over time, the term came to refer to the peoples who spoke these languages.

In ancient times, Semitic peoples were central to early human civilizations, especially in the Middle East and North Africa. The Akkadians established one of the earliest empires in Mesopotamia. Other major Semitic groups included the Amorites, Canaanites, Arameans, and Phoenicians—who spread their alphabet and culture across the Mediterranean. The Hebrews, who became the Jews, were also part of this broader Semitic world. Aramaic became the lingua franca of the region and was even spoken during the time of Jesus.

Today, Semitic peoples include Jews, Arabs, Assyrians, Maltese, and Ethiopian groups such as the Amhara and Tigray. Arabic is now the most widely spoken Semitic language and the language of the Qur’an. Hebrew, once mostly dormant, has been revived as the national language of Israel. Aramaic still survives in small Christian communities, and Maltese—written in the Latin alphabet—is the only Semitic language that is also an official language of the European Union.

A Final Reflection

The Qur’an, revealed in Arabic, belongs to the Semitic family of languages. Arabic is a Central Semitic language within the Afroasiatic linguistic group, and today it is spoken not only across the Middle East and North Africa but also recited daily by Muslims around the world.

So, when someone accuses another of being “anti-Semitic,” it’s important to understand what the term truly encompasses. Criticizing unjust policies or calling for peace is not hatred—it is, in fact, a call for understanding, justice, and unity not just among all Semitic brothers and sisters, but humanity as a whole.

Peace, anas

BUS CRASHES – WHO IS AT FAULT?





Sayidina Umar ibn al-Khattab once said:
“If a mule were to stumble in Iraq, I fear that Allah would ask me: O Umar, why did you not pave the road for it?”
This profound statement reflects the deep sense of accountability that early Muslim leaders held—not just for people, but for every living being under their care. It reminds us that leadership is not about status or position, but responsibility—especially for what goes wrong.
In Malaysia, over the past few months, we’ve witnessed a disturbing number of bus and lorry crashes. Lives have been lost. Families shattered. Futures erased in seconds.
Who is at fault?
Is it the driver who was overworked and under-rested?
The company that pushed for unreasonable hours to maximise profit?
The enforcement agency that turned a blind eye to vehicle conditions?
The policymaker who failed to improve road safety regulations?
The public who stays silent after each tragedy?
If Sayidina Umar were alive today, he would not look to blame others first. He would ask himself:
“What could I have done to prevent this?”
Until we reach that level of collective responsibility, accidents will keep happening—and the innocent will keep dying.
Let us honour the trust placed upon us—whether as leaders, managers, voters, citizens, or even just fellow road users.
Because accountability isn’t just a legal issue.
It’s a moral and spiritual one.
Peace, anas