Followers

Monday, June 1, 2015

Benedikt Koehler: Early Islam and the Birth of Capitalism by Benedikt Koehler for ISLAMiCommentary

Arabs first made a name for themselves in business; their reputation for religious zeal came later. Arabs earned a reputation as long distance traders and risk investors long before the advent of Islam, and arguably the spread of Islam also was a breakthrough for capitalism and globalization. This is hardly surprising, considering Islam is the only world religion whose founder had a background in business and came from a long line of merchants.
For Muhammad, trade diplomacy ran in the family. His family, the Hashimites, take their name from Muhammad’s great grandfather Hashim, a merchant who became famous because he struck trade agreements with Bedouins that made caravan travel across Arabia’s deserts safer and thus more profitable. Muhammad’s own business career took off when his future wife Khadija bint Khuwaylid backed him with an investment. Khadija, a professional investor, later married Muhammad and became the first convert to Islam. Muhammad, during their twenty-four years of marriage, had insight into the risks and rewards of investing in caravans. He made good use of that knowhow when he established his community in Medina and introduced institutions and guidelines for a society where entrepreneurs would thrive.
In Medina, one of Muhammad’s key initiatives was to set up a market. Moreover, during a food crisis, he showed his support for letting markets develop their own dynamics free from outside interference. A famine had squeezed up the price of food, and Muhammad’s adherents appealed to him to set a price cap but Muhammad refused, saying he had no mandate to set prices because, as he explained: “Prices are in the hand of God.” That pronouncement is akin to Adam Smith’s notion that markets are ruled by an “invisible hand.” However, that is not the only instance where early Islamic approaches to markets anticipate modern economics. According to the economist Friedrich von Hayek, societies that give free rein to entrepreneurial drive create wealth and encourage innovation more widely, and that pattern showed up in early Islamic societies from the first. For example, after Muhammad conquered land around Khaybar, he awarded to his Companions land grants but stipulated they had to distribute harvests to provide for the poor. At that moment, Muhammad in effect introduced into Islamic property law the concept of trusteeship. It did not take long for his successors to find new applications for that innovation.
2EarlyIslamC1 (2)The first caliph, Abu Bakr, vested property to provide for his descendants, and the third caliph, Osman, bought a well in Medina and gave it over to public use free of charge. Over time, many wealthy individuals ring-fenced assets that were dedicated to a wide range of charitable purposes, and these charities came to be known as waqfs. The scale of these endowments was considerable. By the eighteenth century, waqfs in Istanbul provided 30,000 meals a day. Many other waqfs supported educational academies, the madrasas. But the list of economic reforms of early Islam goes on, culminating in the seventh century with the creation of a new currency, the Islamic dinar. The Islamic dinar was based on gold, the first time a gold currency was issued outside Europe.
The dynamism of early Islamic economies could not fail to impress trading partners from Europe. In fact, although the politics of Islam and Christendom in the Middle Ages for the most part were adversarial, in the commercial world there were durable on-going relationships. Trade flows across the Mediterranean stimulated enterprise in cities such as Venice and Genoa, where merchants launched convoys that set out to buy high priced goods to bring home and sell. Convoys and caravans may seem to have nothing in common – but their business model is the same: investors advance money for a venture, and managers earn a bonus tied to performance. The legal frameworks of convoys and caravans were virtually identical.
Crusaders and religious orders settling in Palestine observed other Islamic practices and institutions that proved useful back home. When a certain Walter de Merton in thirteenth-century England vested assets to endow an institution for educating scholars in Oxford, the terms of the legal agreement to all intents and purposes replicated those of a waqf to set up a madrasa. By then, waqfs had been in operation for many centuries in Islamic societies, but in England the concept had never been applied before.
Individuals who had first hand exposure to Islamic societies pioneered many innovations in medieval Europe. In particular, Europe’s brightest mathematicians often were trained by Arabs. Pope Sylvester II as a young man went to study in Muslim Spain and when he came back explained how to calculate using an abacus, a skill Europeans had forgotten after the Roman Empire had collapsed. Leonardo Fibonacci, a seminal mathematician from Pisa, grew up in Algeria where he had an Arab teacher who showed him how to use zeros, an invaluable skill for anyone pursuing a career in business.
But scholars, pilgrims, and intellectuals were not the only Europeans who ventured into the realm of Islam. Merchants were another key group. The tradition of buccaneering businessmen who imported luxury goods from Asia to Europe began long before Islam. Already in ancient Rome, status-conscious consumers were willing to pay high prices for pearls (these came from Bahrain), incense (from Yemen), and pepper (from India). Stopovers for merchants were in place all along major trade routes in the Middle East, and when the Islamic Empire supplanted Byzantine rule, the Greek term for these hostels – pandocheion – morphed into funduq. (Today, the term in Arabic refers to hotels.) Islamic rulers understood long distance trade was a source of tax revenue and actively encouraged the establishment of funduqs across the Islamic Empire. Funduqs were self-contained walled buildings where merchants had lodgings and kept their merchandise under lock and key. Saladin, whose name is usually mentioned in connection with his war against the Crusaders, was a key proponent of trade liberalisation. Saladin licensed many Europeans to open up funduqs in Egypt and elsewhere, and Alexandria once more became what it had been in Antiquity, the leading trade hub in the Eastern Mediterranean. Funduqs also opened up in Cairo, Damascus, and in many other trade centers from Morocco to the coasts along the Black Sea. In many ways, funduqs were forerunners of today’s offshore trade centers – foreign merchants had separate tax codes and every funduq had a general manager who acted as a legal representative in case a merchant had a grievance against local authorities.
The dynamism of Islamic economic policies was key to the success of Islamic societies in the Middle Ages, and knowledge transfers to Europe were a spark for invigorating economic growth in Italy that rippled across Europe. Europeans decoupled from Islamic models once they launched their own gold currencies, and devised frameworks for entities that turned into corporations. From then on, European economies had their own engines of economic growth – and began to overtake Islamic economies. But it still took many centuries, however, until Adam Smith would come forward and re-discover Muhammad’s insight: the guiding principle of a market is an “invisible hand.” Indeed, Islamic societies today looking to invigorate economic dynamism do not need to prop on to their economies institutional templates from abroad: a complete set of policies regarding competition policy, consumer protection, and fair trading is contained in the economic reforms of Muhammad and of his early successors. Arguably, the roots of Chicago economics lie in seventh century Medina.
Benedikt Koehler was born 1953 in New York and raised in Germany. His university education was at Yale (BA History), Tübingen (Dr. phil.), and City University London (MSc). He retired from a career in finance and economics in 2012, and has written biographies of the nineteenth century political economist Adam Müller and of the cofounder of Deutsche Bank Ludwig Bamberger. He is editor of “History of Financial Disasters 1857-1923.” A historian and former banker, his articles on early Islamic economics have appeared in the journal Economic Affairs since 2009. This above piece is a summary of his forthcoming book “Early Islam and the Birth of Capitalism” (Lexington Books, Summer 2014).
As part of a new three-year ‘History of Capitalism’ course, Koehler delivered an inaugural lecture, at the Legatum Institute in London, based on his forthcoming book. In his lecture, Koehler proposed a strikingly original thesis; that capitalism first emerged in Arabia, not in late medieval Italian city states as is commonly assumed. The discussion was moderated by Legatum Institute Senior Adviser, Hywel Williams, and can be viewed here, including a transcript of his remarks. Also see Koehler’s article for the Institute of Economic Affairs.
The article were taken from  http://islamicommentary.org/2014/04/benedikt-koehler-early-islam-and-the-birth-of-capitalism/#sthash.QX8VnD2P.dpuf

Friday, May 29, 2015

MAS- I am beginning to like this Mueller fella

When I graduated back in 1988, I joined a multi-national. My job involved travelling regularly and I stayed in hotels frequently. While the company allowed us to claim in full, I found it ridiculous to pay RM1 or RM2 a piece for laundry. So I pack extra clothes and brought the dirty ones back and sent them to the typical launderette which charged only RM4 per kilo. Yes, I had to use my own money, but it was better than to waste the company money – the organisation that provides me a living and a great avenue to learn and better my skills.

When I was stationed at Mentakab for about a year, my girlfriend was in Kuala Lumpur. I called her daily. In the days where there were no mobile phones or phone cards, I used to change notes to coins and use my own money to make my personal calls instead of using the company line which I consider as ‘haram’ or sinful. A few of my sales subordinates started to do the same thereafter.

Today, I try hard to convince clients that they do not need to house me in special suites at hotels with fruit baskets and the unnecessary extras. A comfortable regular room is sufficient.

These are just simple examples. I could list you many more but, it is hard to convince people to be frugal and prudent with other people’s money. Heck! Many Malaysians cannot even do that with their own money!

As such, I find the direct, honest and on the spot explanation (The STAR page 3, 29th May 2015) by Christoph Mueller, the current MAS CEO refreshing and absolutely timely. The situation is not peculiar to MAS. It is a cancer in our society – from businesses, to GLCs, to government bodies. We need to do deep and honest reflections and correct ourselves. This is not just a top management problem as many like to make believe. This is an endemic and involves the entire organisation.

Perhaps, MAS could be our ‘mirror’ and serve as a lesson to us all. I hope we learn well and learn quickly.

Peace.

Anas Zubedy

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Get your #SaySomethingNice poster now!

many colors,one raceThursdays with zubedy      

"Keep your thoughts positive because your thoughts become your words. Keep your words positive because your words become your behaviour. Keep your behaviour positive because your behaviour becomes your habits. Keep your habits positive because your habits become your values. Keep your values positve because your values become your destiny."

- Mahatma Gandhi

The #SaySomethingNice poster is an easy and simple way of promoting positivity. One poster can carry 72 messages and impact the lives of thousands. The #SaySomethingNice poster has been widely circulated since 2013. Join us in taking up the poster and adding values to those around you. 

Interested parties can request and place as many copies of the poster around their premises or on public notice boards from Hari Merdeka to Hari Malaysia. If you wish to customise the poster or print them at your own cost, we can provide the design upon request.With this poster up and ready to be written on, colleagues or students or members of the public have the opportunity to share something nice on the poster's yellow sticky notes.

Any interested parties can request for the #SaySomethingNice poster from zubedy. Just let us know how many copies you need, when (and how) you will pick them up, and we will arrange accordingly. For poster request or further information, please do not hesitate to contact our person-in-charge, Izdiyad Lockman at 019-2690804 / 03-77336419 or email izdiyad@zubedy.com



Wednesday, May 27, 2015

LET’S READ THE QURAN (LRTQ) Campaign





In 2009, a few friends and I got together and decided to launch a campaign to encourage people to read and understand the Quran better.

I feel that it is time to do another LRTQ Campaign, this fasting month – Ramadhan 2015.
If you are interested, please keep me posted either via facebook or email me at anas@zubedy.com

As per the earlier campaign, this campaign is not only for Muslims, but also for our brothers and sisters who are Christians, Buddhists Hindus, Sikhs and those who believe in a God-Head but not so gung-ho about being in any brand of religion, too. The idea is to join us and share your ideas. Even an atheist could join – as long as we are well intentioned and are genuine truth seekers.

The goal of this campaign is to encourage people to read the Quran in the language they most understand and find in it areas of common values in our day-to-day living.
What is the Campaign all about?

Read the Quran in the language that you are familiar with.

When will the campaign start and end?

Ramadhan 2015 till Aidil-Fitri (June 18th to July 17th, 2015)

Where to share?

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Blogs, Articles, etc. Please use the hashtag #LRTQ2015 in Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Why?

Make Quran relevant to our daily living. For Muslims, to know and practice; for Non-Muslims to feedback us when we do not and look for shared values between us.
Who can join?

Everyone who has positive intention - the more the merrier!

How?

·         Read the Quran in the language you know best – from a physical book, the internet, etc.

·         Write, post or share Quranic Verses or short articles based on the Quranic text – both your own or a good article you came across. Like the LTRQ2015 Page and post your comments there https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-Read-The-Quran-2015/722882937821762?sk=timeline

·         Ask questions about the Quranic message, ponder, reflect and suggest your thoughts and feelings.

Peace and Thanks,


Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Have A Meaningful Wesak - Tomorrow in The STAR


Larry Yap (1956-2015) was a client and a friend. A good man who did not complain about why others were richer than him but cared more about the poor in his midst. An example of a moderate Malaysian who was kind, understanding, wise and honorable.


Let us be Moderate:
How greed hinders moderation


In our Vaisakhi message, we elaborated the second point of the Ten Principles for a Moderate Malaysian. In this Wesak advertisement, we are happy to share the third principle. We hope you look forward to the upcoming seven.

Principle Number Three.

I will not be greedy. I will not complain about why others are richer than me but worry more about the poor in my midst.

1.     What is greed?

Greed is one of the Three Poisons mentioned in Buddhism. A toxin that hinders us from living in moderation. Greed has many faces - money, power, status, entitlement and gluttony. Greed is an uncontrolled craving that leads to unhappiness. Malaysians who are living with plenty but continue to fight for the right to have more, who compare their lives with the richer and fail to empathize with the poor suffers from greediness. Greed makes even the rich unhappy.

2.     Why greediness hinders moderation?

Greed is the poison that challenges our generosity. It chips away our humanity and blinds us from the joy of giving and helping others. Greed makes us want more, makes us selfish, makes us blind to justice, and makes us celebrate form over substance. The language of greed is ‘win-lose’ and ‘I’. Greed is all about ‘me’. Moderation speaks on ‘win-win’ and focus on ‘us’ and ‘we’. A greedy person can no longer be moderate as it is difficult to be moderate and greedy at the same time.

3.     How to conquer greediness and practice moderation?

We must decide on what is enough. We must choose to be thankful. When we look into our neighbour’s bowl, we worry if he has enough, not if he has more. By doing so, we will deal with our wants and focus on others’ needs. We must control our minds and take charge of our hearts. We must be convinced that greed makes us unhappy and generosity is the antidote. We must make ‘care’ more important than ‘cash’. Look around and we can see that generous people who live moderately are often the happiest, calmest and the most content among us. When we decide to find peace within our hearts, we will conquer greed. Then, we will become an agent of moderation.

At zubedy, our programs draw strength from shared values and traditions. We believe that at heart, all Malaysians want good things for themselves and for their brother and sister Malaysians, simply because our nation cannot prosper as a whole if some of us are left behind.

You and I, we must conquer greediness and be Moderate Malaysians.

Let us add value,
Have A Meaningful Wesak.



Thursday, April 16, 2015

A plus point for non-proliferation by Shad Saleem Faruqi - The STAR

Despite many gaping holes, the framework agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme is a notable achievement
THE framework agreement between six world powers and Iran in Lausanne, Switzerland, on Teheran’s nuclear programme is a huge diplomatic victory for United States President Barack Obama. He showed firm leadership in staying the course despite massive criticism from Israel and its sycophants in the US Congress. Likewise, President Hassan Rouhani of Iran stood up to the rightist ideologues in his country.
Despite many flaws, the blueprint may facilitate a breakthrough in ongoing but difficult nuclear negotiations. Prof Matthew Bunn of Harvard’s Belfer Centre says that the agreement is a positive step for non-proliferation. The deal contains stringent technical conditions that will make any “breakout attempt” (attempt to produce a nuclear weapon) easily detectable.
Iran will be required to decommission some of its enrichment facilities. Fordo, an underground site, will be converted to a research centre where fissile material is banned. Another heavy-water reactor will be redesigned to disable it from making bomb-grade plutonium.
These measures will prevent the development of a nuclear bomb during the 15-year period of the deal. Supporters of Israel must note that during this period Israel will retain its nuclear monopoly of the region.
If Iran secretly takes the tragic course of developing nuclear weaponry, the monitoring will lengthen the breakout time from a few weeks to one year, thus giving the West opportunity to explore all options.
For Teheran, the lifting of sanctions (valued at US$110bil a year) will create economic disincentives to experiment with nuclear arms.
Iran will return to the global economy in exchange for curbs on its nuclear programme. The huge Iranian hinterland will be opened up to entrepreneurial Western corporations.
Further, the framework agreement may open the door to a new era in the US-Iran relationship and end the 35-year standoff.
Sceptics are however pointing out that the absence of key details on contentious issues makes the pact extremely fragile. The “fact sheets” publicised by both sides are already indicating clashing interpretations of key clauses.
For example, will sanctions be lifted immediately or in phases, on the day of the agreement or when the deal is put in place? Will inspections and verifications extend to “any place, any time” or will military sites be excluded?
To the critics, rapprochement with Iran is neither possible nor desirable because Iranian and US interests do not coincide on crucial policies. In the conflicts in Syria, Iraq and Yemen, the fight is between Iranian and Western proxies.
While there is place for such scepticism, one must remember that there are no problems that cannot be resolved. Nothing is insurmountable. The journey of a thousand miles must begin with one small step.
The technical details to be hammered out by June 30 pose immense challenges. Yet, it can be hoped that US and Iranian leadership will give peace a chance and accept the daunting task. The US President is a Nobel Peace laureate, and this may be his defining legacy.
In a spirit of reconciliation, both parties should stop regarding themselves as virtuous and the other as evil. Iran must end its silly rhetoric of calling the US a Satan.
It needs to make amends for the flagrant violation of international law by its illegal occupation of the American embassy and hostage taking of 52 American personnel for 444 days, beginning Nov 4, 1979.
The US, in turn, must expiate for the horrendous crime of shooting down an Iranian Airbus in the Persian Gulf on July 3, 1988, killing all 290 on board. Besides a 35-year-old economic siege, the US has tried repeatedly to overthrow the government of Iran. There are claims that in cohorts with Israel it has murdered Iranian officials and scientists.
Western lies and hypocrisy about a nuclear-armed Iran must be ended. The truth is that Iran does not possess any nuclear bomb.
Israel does, and is secretive about it. Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel is not.
Iran has openly stated that it seeks to enrich uranium for nuclear medicine and electrical power. Under the Non-Proliferation Treaty it has an “inalienable right” to do so. Its conduct is no different from what Brazil, Argentina, Japan and other countries do under IAEA supervision.
Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa (religious edict) in 2005 that the production, stockpiling or use of nuclear weapons is un-Islamic. Sometime ago Iran proposed a nuclear free zone in the Middle East. There was thunderous silence from Israel and the West.
As early as 2003-2005, Iran had sought accommodation with the West by limiting its number of centrifuges to 3,000. Had the West then responded, the recent agreement would have been reached in 2005!
Iran supports the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative endorsed by the Arab League that supports a two-state solution and recognition of Israel.
In violation of international law, the US and Israel have repeatedly threatened Iran with missile strikes if Iran continues to enrich uranium, even for peaceful purposes.
It is grossly dishonest of them to be armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons but threaten Iran for wanting to have nuclear energy.
A nuclear deal with Iran will do the USA, Iran and the rest of the world much good. Those who oppose war and regard nuclear weapons as a despicable abuse of science should welcome diplomacy between Iran and the major powers and condemn Israel and its congressional allies for their lies, hysteria and fear-mongering.
As with his initiative on Cuba, President Obama must embark on the path of reconciliation with Iran. He should put the interest of America first and not allow Israel to push his country into war with Iran. Like Abraham Lincoln on the abolition of slavery and Richard Nixon on bridges to China, Obama should provide leadership.
I think it was Jesse Jackson who said of situations like this: “Leaders of substance do not follow opinion polls. They mould opinion, not with guns or dollars or position but with the power of their souls.”

Monday, April 13, 2015

Have A Meaningful Vaisakhi - Tomorrow in The STAR

“I believe that the principles by which you live is a measure of your faith.” – Karpal Singh (1940 – 2014)


Let us be Moderate:The connection between 
thankfulness and moderation

In our Chinese New Year advertisement, we elaborated the first point of the Ten Principles for a Moderate Malaysian. In this Vaisakhi message, we are happy to share the second principle. We hope you look forward to the upcoming eight.

Principle Number Two.

I will practice the spirit of thankfulness. Instead of complaining, I work with what I have. I know deeply that the little that I have is enough to move me forward if I am sincere and conscious.


1. Why thankfulness?

A moderate person practices thankfulness. A thankful person celebrates life. To be happy, we must first be thankful. Thankfulness is a sign of peace within. A thankful person believes life is good and will surround themselves with positivity. A thankful person will always interpret a future that moves forward. A thankful person is a happy person; and happiness breeds moderation. When we are thankful, we cleanse our heart off greed, envy, anger and pride.

2. Why what we have is enough?
Because that is the formula of success. Only those who believe that what they have is enough will be able to take action immediately. Those who feel that they do not have enough will play the waiting game and delay their actions. A person who believes that what they have is enough will not put the blame on external influences. A thankful person will work with what they have. They would make a home out of a humble house and a school out of a shack. They would turn to creativity, ingenuity and hard work when faced with obstacles.

3. How to be a thankful person?
A thankful person trusts in a merciful God and sees life as a gift. When put to test, even a great one, a thankful person believes that it is an opportunity to discover God’s message and God wants us to first fight the enemy within. To do that, a thankful person must first deal with himself. As Guru Nanak rightly puts it; by conquering your mind, you can conquer the world. As such, a thankful person will always see the silver lining or hikmah in every situation.

At zubedy, our programs draw strength from shared values and traditions. We believe that at heart, all Malaysians want good things for themselves and for their brother and sister Malaysians, simply because our nation cannot prosper as a whole if some of us are left behind.

You and I, we must practice the spirit of thankfulness and be Moderate Malaysians.

Let us add value,
Have A Meaningful Vaisakhi.