All statements made to maintain
stability and to seek economic progress went completely ignored.
Instead, attendees were more interested to jeer at side statements
including but not limited to kandang-minium, failures of the royal
commission of inquiry, submarines and, even, unresolved murder cases.
Adelyn Yeoh, The Malaysian Insider
Here is why.
I recently attended a pro-opposition forum that
addressed economic issues of the 1990s and I could not help but notice
how similar the attendees were. It was not so much in terms of the way
they dressed — they were clad in a whole variety of garments — but they
were similar in the way they reacted to the speakers.
One could
not help but notice the fixated minds of the general audience. The
crowd was quite typical of what you would expect of a kopitiam setting;
loud, brazen and very infatuated with the opposition party. To me, it
was a sea of homogenous, single-minded people.
When the speakers
expectedly gave their very salient, logical points about the issue, it
came as no surprise when most of the audience only responded positively
to the almost-slanderous jabs at previous government scandals.
All
statements made to maintain stability and to seek economic progress
went completely ignored. Instead, attendees were more interested to
jeer at side statements including but not limited to kandang-minium,
failures of the royal commission of inquiry, submarines and, even,
unresolved murder cases.
It then made me wonder if the attendees
were there just to feel better about themselves by mocking the
government instead of being there to get enlightened. Is this what our
voter population has turned into?
Before I go on, I need to make a
disclaimer that I am not pardoning the government from its previous
sins — admittedly the amount of nonsense that has plagued the country
has increased exponentially in recent years.
Yet this does not
mean the converse is true i.e. the opposition has a completely clean
slate. As such, it is important for voters to not be swept up by
emotions, by the adrenaline of collective angst at the government and,
instead, adopt a critical view of all parties.
However, we are
moving dangerously towards polarising mentalities. Our voter population
is splitting into two very distinct groups; pro-opposition or
pro-government. As a result, many people are beginning to adopt this
mentality of “with us or with them.”
We are moving towards
politics based on superficial qualities and this is dangerous because
this will lead to us to blindly supporting parties to all ends,
including bad ones. It also becomes difficult for groups and
organisations that strive to be apolitical to remain apolitical.
Bersih
3.0 is an excellent example of this. The steering committee and more
notably Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan had stressed the fact that they are an
apolitical organisation but, unfortunately, Bersih suffered the fate
of being dragged into looking political due to the conduct of
opposition supporters during the rally and the overwhelming presence of
opposition leaders.
This should not be the way to move forward. This is not the only way for change.
Wanting
change for our country does not necessitate being pro-opposition. You
can yearn for change without subscribing to a single political party,
without proclaiming how you will follow a particular party to its
death.
You can want change by proclaiming to elect the best
party at a particular given time. And it is also important to add that
your view should be subject to change if the party fails to meet
certain benchmarks.
For these reasons I don’t support the
opposition blindly. But that does not mean I support the government
either. I support the best party, which happens to be the opposition at
this particular time. And for that reason I would be more than happy
to give them my support now.
However, if one day the current
opposition fails to meet my benchmarks and, instead, the current
government meets those very benchmarks, be assured that I will be
voting for the government. This is not to say that I am on the fence
about my political position.
Like many of you, I want what is
best for my country. In order to achieve this, we, as a society, must
be willing to put our egos aside, learn to perceive local politics in a
more critical manner and vote for the best party, regardless of what
that may be.
Adelyn is an undergraduate student in
Mount Holyoke College, USA, where she is pursuing International
Relations and Mathematics. She also writes for CEKU at http://www.ceku.org.
2 comments:
title said says support but content says otherwise. which one is it? even at this very particular time, the opposition is remotely far from being the best party of the two. one thing clear from the writing is the opposition gets their support by playing the emotion of their supporters..
Its actually normal in a democracy for people to 'let off steam' If opposition supporters were too perfect that would be more freaky.
Most leaders of the world are hardly popular. The US election will be a choice between candidates that don't seem to have inspired the disillusioned masses. Same thing in Australia, Europe is in political financial turmoil, and they have a new PM each year in Japan.
Malaysia can't evolve without change and most BN politicians have been there for decades. I don't see PKR as the solution to all the problems of the world but regime change is a healthy thing for a democracy and in this case its overdue.
Post a Comment