The China earthquake was man made? A new weapon of mass destruction?
Click here http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2483018799620172183&q=Fulford+vs+Haarp&ei=Q3dCSM6OCYGgqQP9j4ToCA
The terrorists were not responsible for the 9/11 tragedy as they found no photo evidence of a plane wreckage at the Pentagon attack?
Click here http://www.911inplanesite.com/
What do you think?
Note there are two votes, the first two for the China earthquake, the second two for the 9/11. Last day to vote is June 30th 2008.
Thanks!
3 comments:
Dea Anas,
About the HARP, to me, it is not difficult to verify, just ask some physics scientists, especially in the academic world they will tell you whether it is possible or not.
Frankly, I have serious doubt. But well, not many people believe in atomic bombs in 1940s either.
As for the wreckage for 911, everybody saw the planes slamming in to the buildings. Now someone is trying to suggest it was illusion by David Copperfield? : =)
Cheers,
BIn
Seems we may be on the same page as regards the possibility of artificially induced "natural" disasters. I blogged about this last week. HAARP has been the subject of much discussion since the 1970s but only amongst "conspiracy theorists" - the vast majority of "sheeple" do not as a rule enjoy peering over the edge of consensus reality into the abyss. It's very scary, just the thought that all our established institutions - government, covert agencies, defence department, even the UN and religious bodies - may be corrupt through and through or infiltrated by secret societies that behave just like the Mafia, the CIA, Mossad, M16, Chinese Triads and the Yakuza. Nevertheless, there comes a point when all data must be taken aboard and examined without fear or preconception - if one genuinely desires to penetrate the veils.
Post a Comment