Followers

Monday, January 9, 2012

Shed 10 pounds this year by Amy Bertrand - The STAR

Shed 10 pounds this year

Small changes in diet can lead to weight loss

Sometimes simple changes can bring about big results. When it comes to losing weight, more often than not, it’s all about numbers.

“Simply think of your body like a machine.” says Beth Mueth, a dietitian at Belleville (III.) Memorial Hospital. “Calories in have to equal calories out in order to maintain your weight. The majority of us have calories in more than out. But all it takes is a little change to turn that the other way around”

It takes 3,500 calories to build a pound. If you have a deficit of 100 calories every day for a year – either by eating less or exercising more – you can lose 10 pounds in a year.

But going on a diet where you give up everything you love is not going to work forever. Katie Duggan, a dietitian at St. Louis University School of Public Health, says that teaching people to make small changes is often the only way to bring about results.

“A lot of people want weight lost to be their New Year’s resolution.” She says. “ It’s a constant struggle for most Americans.

At any given time millions of people are trying different diets to lose weight, but most of the weight is regained as people return to their old eating habits.

“ The key is to make small changes that are reasonable, achievable and realistic to maintain.”

Duggan says she often tells her clients to write down everything they eat and drink; then they start looking at small changes they can make in that pattern.

“Over the course of a year, a small change can easily add up to 5,10, even 15 pounds,” she says.

“You don’t have to give up everything. I believe people get stuck because all of these things. If you have a favorite food, you don’t have to give it up.”

So with the help of health experts and our own experiences, we’ve come up with a list of 25 ways you can lose 10 pounds this years. – St. Louis Post- Dispatch/McClatchy Tribune Information Services.

1. Switch from whole-milk products to skim-milk products. If you consume three servings a day, you can save up to 200 calories a day. That’s 20 pounds you can lose next year.

2. When you go to a restaurant, ask for half of your portion to be put in a doggie bag right away. Even if you only go out twice a week, you’ll easily save enough calories to lose 10 pounds a year.

3. Reduce the use of butter and margarine. Use applesauce in recipes instead of oil. Try fat-free, butter-flavored spreads or sprinkles (unless you’re watching your salt) Just eliminating a pat of butter on your morning toast will let you drop around 10 pounds.

4. Chill soups, gravies and stew,, then skim off the fat that floats. Doing this can save you up to 100 calories a serving.

5. Use extra-lean ground beef, ground chicken or ground turkey. Instead of bacon, use Canadian bacon or prosciutto, a lean Italian ham. Buy beef labeled “select,” instead of “choice” or “prime” (select meats have less fat, Duggan says). Trim all fat from meat cuts.

6. Is a tall glass of juice your morning ritual? Swap the 20-ounce OJ for a real orange and you not only save more than 100 calories, you also get some fibers while you’re at it.

7. Meatless products, such as imitation hot dogs, bacon burgers and sausage, are easily available at the market. They often gave half the calories of their meat counterparts.

8. Eliminate that daily coffee-house run. Switching from a 16-ounce cappuccino to regular coffee with artificial sweetener can save you well over 10 pounds a year.

9. Switch from fried potato chips to the baked ones. Doing so save 90 calories. If you do this every day, that’s your 10 pounds.

10. Learn how to add 10 minutes of exercise a day. The goal is 30 minutes a day. If you walk for just 30 minutes – even just three 10 minutes walks a day – you will lose 13 pounds this year.

11. Switch from 100-plus-calorie sandwich bread to the light whole-wheat bread. You save 100 calories per sandwich, and you get the benefit of good-for-you whole grains.

12. Swap out your cheese. Replace the 1 ½ ounces of cheddar or American cheese on your sandwich with 1 ounce of nonfat mozzarella and lose 11 pounds next year.

13. Switch from two tablespoons of regular mayonnaise to two tablespoons of low-fat mayonnaise on that sandwich.

14. Cut back on egg yolks. It’s the yolk that contains virtually all of the fat and cholesterol. Try using egg substitutes. Or, in most recipes, you can use two egg whites instead of one whole egg.

15. If you love microwaves popcorns, you don’t have to give it up. Just switch to the light kind and save tons of fat and calories, enough to lose 10 pounds if you eat it every night.

16. Use sugar substitute instead of sugar in all your baking, if you use a couple of teaspoon in your iced tea and a couple on your morning cereal, you could easily lose 10 pounds by switching a substitute

17. Switch your afternoon soda to a diet soda to save 150 calories (per 12-ounce can) a day.

18. If you cant take diet soda, just downsized your soda portions. If you usually pick up a 4-ounce soda in the morning, switch to a 24-ounce size and save about 200 calories a day. That’s about 20 pounds this year.

19. Portion control is essential when it comes to eating meat. A portion of meat is 3 ounces – about the size of a deck of cards. Most people eat two to three times this. Try putting just a portion of your plate at meals.

20. Replace your regular beet with light beer and save about 50 calories per bottle.

21. Take the stairs every day at work. If you go up and down often enough (say up and down five flights three or four times a day) you’ve got your 100 calories.

22. Forgo regular bottled salad dressing ( 2 tablespoons, about 150 calories) for an equal portion of fat-free dressing (about 40 calories) for a new savings of at least 100 calories.

23. Don’t super-size anything. Switching from the 6-ounce fries at Mcdoland’s to the 2-ounce size saves you about 300 calories. So doing that just twice a week can lead to a big weight loss.

24. Remove the skin from a chicken breast after cooking and save 100 calories each time.

25. Instead of topping ice cream with crumbled cookies, crushed chocolate candy or hot fudge, tip it with 2 tablespoon of fresh berries and save about 100 calories.

Long- term strategies.

Forget all the latest fads, gimmicks and “miracle” diets. The only way to lose weight – and keep it off – is to eat less and exercise more. It sounds simple, but requires disciplines.

Getting started

- ask yourself why you want to lose weight. Successful dieters shed pound for themselves, not for a significant other (such as a wife or boyfriend) or a special events (such as a reunion)

-before you begin, keep a diary for a few days of what you eat and drink and how much your exercise; this will help you learn what you fattening habits are.

Getting active

- ­start moving: Walk more, take the stairs, park father away in the parking lot - do whatever it takes to get more exercise.

- Begin an exercise program: Walking, swimming, whatever you like; aim for 30 minutes a day.

Choosing food

- Cut back on fats AND calories; don’t think you can eat more of a good just because it’s fat-free.

- Choose plenty of fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy products, lean meat, poultry and fish, few sweets.

- Drink six to eight glasses of water a day.

- Don’t dismiss your favorite high-calorie foods; simply plan for them. Allow yourself to have a treat once in a while. Remember, you’re in the driver’s seat; you control what you eat.

- Read food labels carefully.

Portion control

Controlling portion size in one of the most effective ways for shedding excess weight and keeping it off.

- Small plates: Use a salad plate instead of a dinner plate; a fuller plate makes it seems that you are eating a lot.

- Do a monthly portion check-up: Use a scale to make sure your portion size has not increased.

- Eat fiber-rich, high-water, low-calorie foods: Feel full without consuming too many calories.

- Eat slowly: Prevent overeating.


Tuesday, January 3, 2012

2012: The Third Force - TMI by Uthaya Sankar

2 JAN — Sejak kecil, apa yang saya faham mengenai “demokrasi” adalah “pemerintahan negara oleh rakyat menerusi wakil-wakil yang dipilih oleh rakyat”.

Begitulah saya dididik oleh guru-guru di SRK Convent Aulong dan SM Darul Ridwan, Taiping. Malah, begitu juga definisi yang saya temui dalam Kamus Pelajar Bahasa Malaysia (1988) terbitan Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP).

Dalam pada itu, amalan “demokratik” pula “menjunjung atau menyokong demokrasi atau kepentingan rakyat biasa”.

Namun, semua itu hanyalah definisi dalam kamus. Apa yang menjadi amalan secara konvensional nampaknya adalah sebaliknya.

Sering kali, wakil yang dipilih oleh rakyat akan lupa daratan dan menganggap diri mereka lebih berkuasa dan berhak menindas rakyat yang sebenarnya memilih mereka melalui kuasa undi semasa pilihan raya.

Pada pendirian saya, kerajaan sepatutnya berterima kasih dan terhutang budi kepada rakyat yang memberikannya peluang mentadbir negara milik rakyat.

Pandangan di atas ada saya paparkan pada ruangan status Facebook pada 19 Oktober 2011 dan mendapat reaksi positif daripada beberapa rakan yang turut prihatin terhadap amalan sebenar demokrasi.

Hasil pemerhatian secara umum pun sudah memadai untuk memberikan gambaran jelas di mana kerajaan (persekutuan dan negeri) bersikap bagaikan “maharaja” yang paling berkuasa.

Rakyat yang memberikan kuasa sebenar itu pula hanya diperlakukan umpama hulubalang, dayang, gundik dan hamba abdi. Si maharaja sahaja yang berkuasa penuh menentukan untung nasib hamba abdi; sementara rakyat diseru supaya terhutang budi kepada maharaja yang memikul tugas memerintah negara.

Perbandingan ini mungkin dilihat sebagai keterlaluan atau simplistik, namun membantu melihat gambaran sebenar tentang apa yang berlaku di depan mata.

Click here to read more on this article

2012 - The Middle Path, Our Shared Value

The path of moderation is, in and of itself, a shared value of all our major beliefs. Let’s make it our resolve for 2012.

The Buddha described the path of wisdom as ‘the middle path’ and taught about moderation in thought, speech, and conduct. Hinduism speaks of a middle path of salvation based on the principles of balance for holistic growth in body, mind and spirit. The Bible talks about temperate behavior between the things that are permissible and the things that are beneficial. Islam promotes ‘wasatiyyah’, the persuasion that the best of works are those done in moderation. Our faiths emphasize the middle path in personal growth and social harmony; in the holistic growth of mind, body and spirit, in our conduct and in our dealings with one another.

“Avoiding both these extremes, the Perfect One has realized the Middle Path; it gives vision, gives knowledge, and leads to calm, to insight, to enlightenment …” - Buddha

The middle path must become a more and more pertinent platform today in a world which is rapidly globalizing. The challenge of dealing with diversity will be most clearly felt in businesses, in education and in social administration, where policies affect a wide range of people. Any decision made must consider the diverse values and needs of those involved, especially in inter-cultural and inter-religious contexts.

A partisan framework cannot serve a diverse environment well. Partisanship pushes people to choose sides and overlooks the many varying degrees of different stands which people can take. But in a global setting where we can no longer overlook diversity, we have to allocate space for the negotiation of different values, needs and hopes from all sides. In today’s diverse society, unity in diversity is a pragmatic matter.

“And [they are] those who, when they spend, do so not excessively or sparingly but are ever, between that, [justly] moderate” – Quran 25:67

As a multi-cultural, multi-religious and multi-lingual society which has managed to firmly progress as one nation, Malaysia is a good example of unity in diversity in a nation that follows the path of moderation. This can be seen in the example of its 1957 Federal Constitution, which found a formula for people of different cultures, religions and languages to go to school, grow up, work and live alongside each other while maintaining their own cultural uniqueness.

The inhabitants of Malaya at that point were made up of the natives and a significant Diaspora of Chinese and Indian ethnic groups. A more partisan stance could have either refused citizenship to the non-natives, or taken an approach of assimilation - absorbing the race, religion and language of the minority into an all-enveloping majority. But the negotiations between the different parties involved - the Malays and non-Malays, the Rulers and the people, the Malayans and the British - were guided by a middle path principle which assumed that all communities should have due position in the land.

To allow for this unity in diversity, they looked for the right balance between the needs, hopes and fears of the Malay and indigenous majority and the non-Malay - the Chinese and Indian - minorities. There must have been significant pressure – for the Malay majority, the pressure could have been to take a more extreme stance in order to have full economic and political power; for the Chinese and the Indians, the pressure could have been to put the needs of their own communities first even if it meant denying the rights of others.

But what is most striking about the Malaysian 1957 Constitution is that great care had been taken to ensure that all parties could get what they wanted only in the measure that it could balance out with what other parties wanted. In other words, all had to give up something, so that all could have a part in everything.


“I have the right to do anything,” you say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything”—but not everything is constructive. No one should seek their own good, but the good of others.” 1 Corinthians 10:23-24

On the economic front, Malaysia’s policies also favored the middle path. To solve the problem of economic disparity between ethnic groups, with the majority Malay being in the lowest rungs, it did not take more extreme measures of nationalizing wealth or taking the wealth of one community to resolve the poverty of another. Instead, it took a moderate path by combining two elements:

(1) the implementation of affirmative action and the redistribution of wealth; and

(2) the shared value of working hard to increase the nation’s per capita income.

The goal was to expand the economic pie so that the poor could be alleviated without taking away the wealth of the others. While its implementation may not have been the most ideal, once again it was workable and has proven effective. Absolute poverty in Malaysia has been reduced from about 50 – 60% to about 3% today. It has served a big part in bringing significant development to the general population as a whole without major divisive conflicts.

“But Yoga becomes the discipline for the destruction of sorrow for him who moderate in eating and recreation, moderate in work and sleep and walking.” – Bhagavad Gita

While the policies I’ve cited may not be perfect, I see that they are good examples of middle path solutions which also seem to indicate a notable point – the middle path works. Malaysia as an entity of different cultures, religions and languages is a microcosm of our global setting which is becoming increasingly cross-cultural. Its experiences finding solutions for a diverse society can be a model of intercultural negotiations and finding unity in diversity.

The key is that the middle path is itself a shared value of most major traditions in the world. It provides a common ground for diverse peoples to meet and negotiate shared values and differences. It presents a common point of departure, guided by the same moderate and temperate behavior that is called for in most cultural value systems, thereby allowing for non-exclusive and non-divisive solutions. It provides the best chances towards solutions that can avoid intercultural conflict.

As the path of our shared values, it is our answer to unity in diversity. Have a meaningful 2012.

Anas Zubedy

Kuala Lumpur

Open Letter To The Pakatan Rakyat Leadership Council by Stephen Doss

Dear Sirs,

I am writing this open letter so as to ensure that it is widely read and with the hope that someone who is capable of representing at least some of you respond.

It has been sometime now that I have had this feeling that as a federal opposition block with the opportunity to govern in some states in Malaysia, there is much more that you could do in dispelling some doubt among Malaysians that you can be better than the little that you present of yourself currently. There is this large body of doubt among Malaysians that we have not seen the best of you nor the worst.

In many developed countries around the world, its citizens have a fairly good idea of what each political party stands for on many key issues. This does not seem to be the case in Malaysia, we seem to know what the ruling federal party is about as we are still governed by many of its policies, for better or for worse. But in the case of the federal opposition in many cases, especially in issues deemed sensitive, you have chosen to be silent.

It is only in the economic sphere that we seem to have some information of what you intend to do if you come to power, but in many other key areas you seem to have been strangely silent. This may seem like a good strategy now, but it is in my humble opinion that it is this lack of transparency that makes people hesitant about who they intend to vote for.

I am sure that a principled coalition as yourself would want to win for what you represent rather than winning sorely on the basis that the other side has overstayed their welcome.

I fervently hope that you can make your position clear on the following issues that have been nagging me in these past few years and I am sure they are of concern to many right thinking citizens as well, as they would provide an insight into the true motivations of your coalition.

1. Capital Punishment

Most developed countries consider the death penalty as barbaric. States and countries around the world are slowly but increasingly abandoning the death penalty as an instrument of punishment. In Malaysia, of course, the death penalty still exists and is still used. Indeed, people are constantly exhorting that its use should be extended.

What are your views? I hope you can be specific and not provide an answer that is neither here nor there as politicians are fond of doing.

2. Canning as corporal punishment

Some developed countries view this punishment as cruel as it leaves a permanent physical and psychological scar on the recipient. It is in some countries considered uncivilized for a state to carry out such punishments.

What are your views on the matter?

3. Islamic law

Over the last few years this subject has generated much interest. Most would agree that some of the laws implemented have been lopsided, and thus are considered manifestly unjust. An example would be how drinking and khalwat in 5 star hotels mostly go unpunished as they appear out of reach unlike the raids often conducted on establishments frequented by people who cannot afford ‘protection’.

What are your views with regards to this lopsided implementation of Islamic laws? How would you do things differently


4.
Civil Service

It seems there is a tendency to mollycoddle and provide preferential treatment for those working in government when compared to those working in the private sector, although the private sector contributes to nation building just as much.


It has become common knowledge that the size of the civil service workforce has become difficult to manage where in some positions there is one person doing the job of two and yet in other positions two or three persons doing the job of one.


How would you recommend overcoming these problems and improving the benefits of private sector workers?


5.
Non-governmental organization personnel

For years these dedicated group of people work for below average salaries and sacrifice themselves for the nation. And yet their needs are rarely addressed, no government recognized benefits, rarely any recognition. And yet they pay the same taxes and contribute no less.


How would you make working for an NGO less of a burden?


These are just some of the many questions I feel would give an insight into how your coalition can win peoples trust if answered sincerely, at the very least they would provide a barometer of your thoughts on other key issues. The list is never ending, maybe there will be other forums, your views on abortion, euthanasia, healthcare, aging and host of other key issues would be most welcome.

I do not ask this of the Barisan Nasional as most people already know them for what they are, but I ask this of you as you still remain an unknown quantity, in most developed countries by now, they would already more or less know who would be their likely ministers even before an election, unfortunately even this is a luxury to us.

I pray for a speedy response and wish you all the best.

Yours sincerely

Stephen Doss

Concerned Citizen